Stepp

Stepp v. In Re: Writ of Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20213:20-cv-01688California1,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT WILLIAM STEPP, Case No. 20-cv-01688-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. AND CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

IN RE: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant.

12 Robert William Stepp, a state prisoner, filed pro se a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the petition is barred by the statute of limitations. Stepp has not filed an opposition or otherwise communicated with the Court despite being provided an additional reminder. Docket No. 19. The Court nevertheless has reviewed the motion, and it is granted. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 imposes a statute of limitations on petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Petitions filed by prisoners challenging noncapital state convictions or sentences must be filed within one year of the latest of the date on which: (A) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.