Kidd

Kidd v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20213:20-cv-08694California1,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK DEWAINE KIDD, Case No. 20-cv-08694-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

RON BROOMFIELD, Defendant.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant, the Warden at San Quentin State Prison. Defendant is directed to file a dispositive motion or notice regarding such motion on or before July 14, 2021. The Court further directs defendant to adhere to the notice provisions detailed in Sections 2.a and 10 of the conclusion of this order. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 6.) DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review In its initial review of this pro se complaint, this Court must dismiss any claim that is frivolous or malicious, or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Pro se pleadings must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.