Amy

Amy v. Curtis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20213:19-cv-02184California10,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 “AMY”, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02184-PJH Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

RANDALL STEVEN CURTIS, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 140 12 13 Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on February 25, 2021. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Carol L. Hepburn and John A. Kawai. Defendant appeared through his counsel, Ethan A. Balogh. Following the hearing, the court sought additional clarification from plaintiffs by way of a supplemental chart of evidence and defendant submitted an opposition with a set of objections in response. The court held an additional hearing on March 25, 2021. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the court hereby GRANTS summary judgment in part and DENIES summary judgment in part as indicated below and for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.