Caldwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MAURICE CALDWELL, Case No. 12-cv-01892-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO.

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 549 Defendants.

Plaintiff Maurice Caldwell retained Martin Cunniff to “analyze Mr. Caldwell’s earning capacity had he not been wrongfully convicted, and to calculate the economic loss that Mr. Caldwell incurred due to his wrongful conviction . . . .” [Docket No. 654-6 (“Cunniff Expert Report”) at 2.] Defendants move to exclude Cunniff’s testimony entirely. [Docket No. 549 (“MIL”).] Caldwell opposes. [Docket No. 640 (“Opp.”).] For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is granted, contingent on Defendants’ ability to reach agreement with Plaintiff on proposed language to be read to the jury regarding the parties’ positions on the cost of therapeutic services reduced to present value. I. BACKGROUND Cunniff’s report offers these five opinions:…