Alden

Alden v. AECOM Technology Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20215:18-cv-03258California4,664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

20 A. Factual Background 21 Between 1997 and 2012, Plaintiff Peter Alden was employed as a technical draftsperson by 22 several contractors at the NASA Ames Research Center (“NARC”) in Mountain View, California. 23 FAC ¶ 11. On November 1, 2009, Alden “blew the whistle” on AECOM, the federal contractor 24 that employed him at that time, by sending a complaint to Anthony Wong, who according to 25 Alden was “the NARC Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) [who was] the 26 government liaison for the AECOM contract.” Id. ¶ 21. Alden’s complaints were concerning 27 AECOM practices that Alden contends impaired drawing productivity. Id. On May 7, 2012, AECOM terminated Alden’s employment. Id. ¶ 12. Alden filed a formal complaint with the NASA Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) on May 7, 2015, complaining that AECOM had defrauded the government and retaliated against him. Id. ¶ 54(a). The NASA OIG denied Alden’s request for relief on May 31, 2016. Id. ¶ 55. B. Procedural History On May 31, 2018, Alden, who represents himself in this litigation, filed the original Complaint in this case, which named both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.