Arroyo

Arroyo v. Dorcich Farms, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20215:20-cv-08216California1,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RAFAEL ARROYO, Case No. 20-CV-08216-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST

v.

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

PREJUDICE

DORCICH FARMS, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants. 17 On January 29, 2021, Defendants filed the instant motion to dismiss the first amended complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”).1 Plaintiff’s response to the instant motion was due on February 12, 2021. Yet as of today, April 12, 2021, Plaintiff—who is represented by counsel from the “Center for Disability Access” division of Potter Handy, LLP— has failed to file a response to the instant motion. Given Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and the merits of the instant unopposed 24 25 1 Defendants’ motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.