Hawthorne

Hawthorne v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20214:17-cv-04960California915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE, Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; REQUIRING

A YANEZ, et al., COMPLIANCE WITH FED. R.

CIV.P.

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 41 12 13 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that SQSP prison officials have violated his constitutional rights. DISCUSSION I. Background On November 24, 2020, the Court screened the amended complaint and found that it stated certain cognizable claims against SQSP officials Fonseca, Yanez, Czajkowski, Davis, Deal, Hagens, Swensen, and Thomas, and ordered service on these defendants. Dkt. No. 30 at 16. The Court dismissed certain other claims with prejudice, Dkt. No. 30 at 15-16, and granted Plaintiff leave to amend two claims: Claim No. 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.