Wittbecker

Wittbecker v. Cupertino Electric

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20215:20-cv-06217California3,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, Case No. 20-cv-06217-BLF and all others similarly situated, and the general public,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO REMAND v. [Re: ECF 19]

CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

14 Plaintiff Roy Wittbecker brings this putative class action against Defendant Cupertino Electric, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive (“collectively referred to as Defendants”) for alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”) and similar California laws. See Ex. A to Notice of Removal (“Compl.”), ECF 1. Defendant removed the action to this Court on the ground that Plaintiff’s claim for relief invokes federal law and thus federal jurisdiction is established per 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Notice of Removal 2, ECF 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand to state court. Mot.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.