Cardenas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DANNY CARDENAS, G36254, Case No. 20-cv-07372-CRB (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE XAVIER BECERRA, et al., Defendant(s). On March 11, 2021, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint, from which “‘it’s virtually || impossible to ascertain . . . who plaintiff is suing and for what relief,” with leave to amend “to file || simple and concise amended complaint that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure || 8(a)(2)’s requirement of ‘a short and plain statement of the claim’ and makes clear ‘who 1s being

15 || sued, for what relief, and on what theory ... .’” ECF No. 16 at 1, 2 (quoting McHenry v. Renne, a || 84 F.3d 1172, 1177-78 (9th Cir. 1996)). The court also warned plaintiff that failure to file a

|| Proper complaint within 28 days would result “in the dismissal of this action.” Id. at 3.

More than 28 days have elapsed since the court’s March 11, 2021…