Ocegueda

Ocegueda v. Zuckerberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20213:20-cv-04444California189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division 1] NATALIE OCEGUEDA, derivatively on Case No. 20-cv-04444-LB behalf of Facebook, . . Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO □ ENLARGE TIME . Re: ECF No. 66 MARK ZUCKERBERG, et al., Oo Defendants.

For the reasons stated in In re Facebook, the court denies the motion because the plaintiff has n

established that the court should lift the PSLRA stay. Jn re Facebook, Inc. S’holder Derivative Liti; || 411 F. Supp. 3d 649, 652-54 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019). The plaintiff’s cases are distinguishable. / at 655-56 (distinguishing King v. Verifone Holdings, Inc., 12 A.3d 1140 (Del. 2011) and Oswald v. Humphreys, No. C 16-00241 CRB, 2016 WL 6582025 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2016)). The case from th || Central District did not address the Facebook decision and has a distinguishable context. This disposes of ECF No. 66. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.