Miguel

Miguel v. Salesforce.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20213:20-cv-01753California5,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIM DAVIS, et al., individually and on Case No. 20-cv-01753-MMC behalf of all others similarly situated, 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; DISMISSING v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO SALESFORCE.COM, INC., et al., AMEND 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is defendants Salesforce.com, Inc. (“Salesforce”), Board of Directors of Salesforce (“Board”), Marc Benioff (“Benioff”), The Investment Advisory Committee (“Committee”), Joseph Allanson (“Allanson”), Stan Dunlap (“Dunlap”), and Joachim Wettermark’s (“Wettermark”) Motion, filed December 7, 2020, “to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.” Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are former Salesforce…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.