Beasley

Beasley v. Tootsie Roll Industries Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20214:21-cv-01297California320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MAXINE BEASLEY, CASE No. 21-cv-01297-YGR Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

VS. IN PART MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 17 Defendant. On January 25, 2021, plaintiff filed this action in Alameda County Superior Court. 12 || Defendant removed the case to federal court on February 23, 2021. (Dkt. Nos. 1-4.) On March 2,

|| 2021, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No.

|} 9.) On March 9, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion to remand based on the lack of subject matter

|| jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 17.) Having carefully considered the briefing and arguments submitted on A the motion, and for the reasons stated on the record at the April 13, 2021 hearing, the Court

|| GRANTs plaintiff's motion to remand the case to state court, DENIES the request for attorney’s

|| fees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.