Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHK
GREGOR LESNIK; STJEPAN PAPES,
13 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE DEFENDANT D2N
14 v. TEHNOLOGIJE D.O.O 15 EISENMANN SE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (“Plaintiffs”) filed their initial complaint on March 7, 2016. ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint on July 16, 2016. ECF No. 20. Plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint on November 17, 2017. ECF No. 37. Plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint on October 31, 2018. ECF No. 269. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Summons Returned that purported to establish that Defendant D2N Tehnologije d.o.o. (“Defendant”) had been properly served. ECF No. 366. On April 17, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for entry of default against Defendant. ECF No. 387. On April 17, 2019, the Court stayed the case. ECF No. 394. On October 30, 2019, the stay was lifted.…