Saso

Saso v. Genho

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20215:21-cv-02030California1,542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 RICHARD SASO and KRISTI SASO, Case No. 21-cv-02030-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND; AND

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST

JOYCE GENHO, FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS Defendant. [Re: ECF 8]

15 Plaintiffs Richard and Kristi Saso move to remand this unlawful detainer action, which Defendant Joyce Genho removed from the Santa Cruz County Superior Court. The Sasos also seek an award of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion to remand. This Court previously vacated the hearing on the motion and advised the parties that the matter would be submitted without oral argument upon the filing of Genho’s opposition or the expiration of time to oppose. See Order Vacating Hearing, ECF 13. On April 13, 2021, the Sasos filed a notice of non-opposition, advising the Court that Genho had not filed opposition by the April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.