Ochea

Ochea v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20213:20-cv-02985-TSHCalifornia4,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RODITHA O., Case No. 20-cv-02985-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

REMAND

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 27 Defendant.

14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Roditha O. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Plaintiff requests the Court grant summary judgment in her favor, reverse the decision of the Commissioner, and remand with instructions to award benefits. ECF Nos. 24 (Pl.’s Mot.) Defendant requests the Court remand for further administrative proceedings. ECF No. 27 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.