Kifle

Kifle v. Youtube LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20213:21-cv-01752California4,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ELIAS KIFLE, Case No. 21-cv-01752-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AMENDED

v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

YOUTUBE LLC, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants.

Pro se Plaintiff Elias Kifle is suing Defendants YouTube LLC and Paypal, Inc. for copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and breach of contract. See Second Amended Complaint (SAC) (dkt. 33). His claims arise from YouTube’s termination of Kifle’s YouTube channel and other users’ subsequent display of Kifle’s videos on YouTube without Kifle’s permission. Id. at 3–4. Kifle now seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction “to restrain Defendants from allowing the copying, reproducing, uploading, displaying, or distributing of [Kifle]’s copyrighted and protected marks on their websites.” Amend. Mot. for TRO (dkt. 31) at 1–2. He also asks the Court to “restore” his channel “and its automated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.