Cameron Dyess v. Estate of Jajuan Lee Morton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAMERON DYESS, Case No. 20-cv-00909-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE UNDER RULE 56(D) ESTATE OF JAJUAN LEE MORTON, et Re: Dkt. No. 39 al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant PA Solutions, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment, for which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 39 (“Mot.”), 43 (“Opp.”), and 45 (“Reply”). In its opposition, Plaintiff requests under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) that the Court deny Defendant’s motion as premature or defer considering it pending further discovery. Opp. at 1, 12. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment without prejudice under Rule 56(d)(1). I. BACKGROUND This action arises from a collision that occurred on December 3, 2017, in which Plaintiff Cameron Dyess was…