Meyer

Johnson v. Meyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20213:19-cv-02345California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-02345-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY

v. MOTION AND EXTENDING

DEADLINES

J. CERMENO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants.

This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which plaintiff alleges claims that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his safety and to his medical needs. On January 22, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment solely on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies for his claims before filing this action. Docket No. 36. (Defendants indicate that, if the motion for summary judgment does not fully resolve the case, they will file another motion for summary judgment on the merits. Id. at 2 n.1.) The court’s most recent scheduling order required plaintiff to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than March 5, 2021. Docket No. 34. Plaintiff has not yet filed an opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.