Pittman

Pittman v. United States Department of Justice

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20214:21-cv-02372California1,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN, Case No. 21-cv-02372-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v.

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PREJUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT INVESTIGATION, et al., COUNSEL 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Randy Pittman, pro se, has filed a petition for return of property seized pursuant to a warrant issued and executed in Alabama. The Court separately granted Pittman’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and now reviews the sufficiency of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons discussed below, Pittman is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed, by filing a response to this order no later than May 20, 2021. If Pittman does not respond to this order by that date, the case will be reassigned to a United States district judge with a recommendation that it be dismissed without leave to amend, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.