In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20215:20-cv-08324California1,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No. 20-cv-08324-SVK In re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

INTERIM CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL

9 Re: Dkt. No. 53

Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiffs TopDevz LLC and Noirefy, Inc. (the “moving Plaintiffs”) for appointment of Keller Lenkner LLC and Romanucci & Blandin, LLC as interim co-lead class counsel. Dkt. 53. Non-moving Plaintiff Synergy RX PBM LLC supports the moving Plaintiffs’ motion. Dkt. 54. Defendant LinkedIn Corporation opposes the motion. Dkt. 58. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 10, 13, 52. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court deems this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES WITHOUT 18 PREJUDICE the motion to appoint interim co-lead class counsel. 19 I. BACKGROUND This case began as two separate suits against LinkedIn: TopDevz, LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.