Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20214:19-cv-00054California2,985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALEC OTTO, Case No. 4:19-cv-00054-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE

THE REPORT OF DAVID WEISBERGER

v.

COLIN LEMAHIEU, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 179 Defendants.

Plaintiff Alec Otto brings this putative class action against defendants Nano f/k/a/ RaiBlocks f/k/a Hieusys, LLC (“Nano”), Colin LeMahieu, Mica Busch, Zack Shapiro, and Troy Retzer (collectively, “Nano Defendants”) as well as B.G. Services SRL f/k/a BitGrail SRL f/k/a Webcoin Solutions (“BitGrail”) and Francesco “The Bomber” Firano (collectively “BitGrail Defendants”) for securities fraud and related claims in connection with defendants’ promotion of and statements regarding a cryptocurrency or digital asset referred to as NANO f/k/a RaiBlocks (“XRB” or “Nano Tokens”). Now before the Court is a motion to strike the report of David Weisberger filed by the Nano Defendants. (Dkt. No. 179.) Mr. Otto opposes the motion (Dkt. No. 185), and the matter was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.