Moses

Moses v. Aerotek Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20215:17-cv-06251California5,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KATHERYN MOSES, Case No. 17-cv-06251-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

AEROTEK, INC., a Maryland corporation, [Re: ECF 35] Defendant.

14 Following the termination of her employment by Defendant Aerotek, Inc., Plaintiff Katheryn Moses filed the present action for retaliation, failure to prevent retaliation, and failure to prevent harassment in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), and failure to provide records in violation California’s Labor Code. Aerotek seeks partial summary judgment with respect to Moses’ FEHA claims and her claim for punitive damages. The motion is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Aerotek is a staffing company that places workers in positions at numerous companies. In September 2014, Aerotek hired Moses as a Recruiter in its San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.