Bautista

Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20214:20-cv-01613California4,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIA DE LA LUZ BAUTISTA-PEREZ, Case No. 20-cv-01613-HSG et al., ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING v. MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION JUUL LABS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 79, 104, 105 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc.’s (“JLI”) and Defendant Coalition for Reasonable Vaping Regulation’s (“CRVR”) motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. Nos. 104, 105. Also pending is Plaintiffs’ amended motion for conditional certification of their Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective action. Dkt. No. 79. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motions to dismiss and GRANTS the motion for conditional certification.1 I. BACKGROUND This is the second motion to dismiss filed by JLI. Both JLI and CRVR contend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.