Lesevic

Lesevic v. Spectraforce

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20215:19-cv-03126California4,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12 PAUL LESEVIC, an individual, on behalf Case No. 19-CV-03126-LHK of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS’ FEES 15 v. Re: Dkt. No. 77

SPECTRAFORCE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Defendant.

19 Before the Court is Class Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees, ECF No. 77 (“Mot.”).1 The 20 Court held a hearing on the motion on April 8, 2021. ECF No. 83. Having considered all the 21 briefing, the oral arguments, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court hereby 22 23 1 Class Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees contains a notice of motion that is separately 24 paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and the points and authorities in support of the motion must be contained in one document with a combined limit of 25 pages. See Civ. Loc. R. 7- 26 2(b).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.