Alexander

Alexander v. The City of Brisbane Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20213:20-cv-04563California6,834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OLGA C ALEXANDER, Case No. 20-cv-04563-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING THE BRISBANE

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

THE CITY OF BRISBANE INC., et al., LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiffs Olga Alexander (“Olga”) and her children T.A. and V.A. filed this action against her separated spouse Timothy Alexander (“Alexander”) and The City of Brisbane Inc., Officers Robert Malone and Abraham Sevilla, Chief of Police Lisa Macias and Commander Mario Garcia (collectively the “Brisbane defendants”) that arose initially out of a domestic dispute between Olga and Alexander. Before me is the Brisbane defendants’ motion to dismiss the five causes of action asserted against them under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: (i) malicious prosecution; (ii) false arrest; (iii) Monell violation; (iv) deprivation of the right to familial association under the Fourteenth Amendment; and (iv) free speech…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.