PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JH KELLY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-05381-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS CLAIM FOR
v. FORECLOSURE OF MECHANICS
LIEN
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (“PG&E”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff JH Kelly’s claim for Foreclosure of Mechanics Lien. Dkt. No. 24 (“Mot.”). JH Kelly opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 41 (“Opp.”). A hearing was held on April 29, 2021. Dkt. No. 54. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND This construction dispute arises out of the Burney K2 Replacement Project (“Project”), which involved the replacement of a natural gas compressor unit and various upgrades at the compressor station near Burnley, California. Dkt. No. 18 (“FAC”) ¶ 11. The Burney Compressor Station is part of PG&E’s natural gas…