Uberti

Uberti v. Gorin

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20213:21-cv-00610California2,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE UBERTI, Plaintiff, No. 21-cv-00610-WHA

v.

SUSAN GORIN, DAVID RABBITT, ORDER DISMISSING CASE; ORDER

SHIRLEE ZANE, JAMES GORE, LYNDA TO SHOW CAUSE WHY GEORGE

HOPKINS, ERICK ROESER, UBERTI SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED

A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT SUBJECT

Defendants.

TO PREFILING ORDER

16 17 In November 2005, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors consolidated the County Auditor-Controller with the County Treasurer-Tax Collector into the Auditor-Controller- Treasurer-Tax Collector (ACTTC) by passing Ordinance No. 5604. California law, specifically, California Government Code Section 24304.2, expressly authorized the consolidation: [n]otwithstanding Section 24300, in the Counties of Lake, Mendocino, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Trinity, and Tulare, the board of supervisors, by ordinance, may consolidate the duties of the offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector into the elected office of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.