Staley

Staley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20214:20-cv-09497California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHARAE M. STALEY, Case No. 20-cv-09497-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL

v. DISCOVERY

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No.

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 On February 4, 2021, Plaintiff Sharae M. Staley brought this ERISA action against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), alleging a failure to provide benefits and a breach of fiduciary duties. Dkt. No. 10 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 34, 42. On April 7, 2021, the parties appeared before the Court for a case management conference. The Court ordered supplemental briefing from the parties regarding the scope of discovery. See Dkt. No. 15. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, see Dkt. Nos. 19, 20, the Court, in its discretion, GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for discovery beyond the administrative record. As an initial matter, MetLife contends that the abuse of discretion standard of review applies. The Ninth Circuit requires an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.