Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20213:20-cv-03343California2,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC (JSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO STRIKE

v. INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 80 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Fortinet brings patent infringement claims against Defendant Forescourt Technologies Inc. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant infringes on five cybersecurity related technology patents. Defendant has filed two motions to strike Fortinet’s infringement contentions. (Dkt. Nos. 46, 80.) Both motions were filed while motions to dismiss the underlying patent infringement claims were pending. (Dkt. No. 24, 71.) Following the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s first motion to dismiss, the parties stipulated to an amended case schedule which included a date for Plaintiff to file amended infringement contentions. (Dkt. No. 70.) Defendant then moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint and Plaintiff’s new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.