Palmer v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20213:20-cv-06309California499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAWRENCE PALMER, Case No. 20-cv-06309-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO FILE

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CITIZENS BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 52 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff filed a putative class action complaint in state court in April 2020. In August he filed and served on all Defendants an amended complaint. The first amended complaint made two claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), one claim California Business and Professions Code section 17200, and one claim under the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”). Defendants removed the action to this Court on September 4, 2020. The complaint alleged that Defendants made unauthorized credit inquiries regarding Plaintiff. After the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to remand and Defendants answered the first amended complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint that is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 52.) Plaintiff seeks to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.