Cisneros
Cisneros v. Vangilder
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 16-cv-00735-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
VACATE ORDER DENYING
v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES J.VANGILDER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 233 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is a motion to vacate the Court’s February 3, 2021 Attorneys’ Fees Order, filed by counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros. Dkt. No. 233. I. DISCUSSION The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, so the Court only briefly addresses them here. On June 21, 2019, the jury returned a verdict in favor of both Plaintiff Cisneros and Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez in the related case Manriquez v. Vangilder, 16-cv-01320-HSG. See Dkt. No. 206. Final judgment was subsequently entered in favor of each Plaintiff against Defendants Vangilder (in the amount of $1,000) and Vasquez (in the amount of $1,500). See Dkt. No. 220, 221. On February 3, 2021, the Court granted in part Plaintiff Manriquez’s motion for…