Zhang

Zhang v. County of Monterey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20215:17-cv-00007California3,904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JACQUELINE ZHANG, Case No. 17-CV-00007-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 105, 107, 108, 109

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al., Defendants. 17 Before the Court are the motions in limine of Plaintiff Jacqueline Zhang (“Plaintiff”), ECF 18 No. 105, and the motions in limine of Defendants County of Monterey (“the County”), Monterey 19 County Resource Management Agency (“RMA”), and Monterey County Parks Department 20 (collectively, “Defendants”), ECF Nos. 107, 108, 109. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, the 21 case law, and the record in this case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of 22 Evidence 403, the Court rules as follows:

24 Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (“MIL”) 25 Plaintiff’s MIL # 1: Plaintiff moves to exclude all testimony by Defendant’s witness Kimberly 26 Moore because Defendants did not identify Moore as a potential witness until after discovery 27 closed. ECF No. 105 at 1–3. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.