Lewis

Lewis v. Brumfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20213:20-cv-04024California1,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARONTA T. LEWIS, Case No. 20-cv-04024-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND COMPLAINT; MOTION TO

BE HEARD; ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MICHAEL BRUMFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

12 On December 9, 2020, Plaintiff Daronta T. Lewis’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 68-page complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 14.) Lewis was told that his complaint could not rely on conclusions rather than facts and could not bring claims that were unrelated by fact and law. (See generally, id.) Lewis was also instructed twice in the December 9, 2020 order that his amended complaint could be no more than 10 pages. (See id. at 1, 4.) Lewis was cautioned that if he did not comply with the instructions given in the December 9, 2020 order, his action may be dismissed. After an extension of time, Lewis filed a First Amended Complaint on February 24, 2021. (Dkt. No. 24.) He then filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.