Manriquez

Manriquez v. Vangilder

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20214:16-cv-01320California1,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, Case No. 16-cv-01320-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

v. Re: Dkt. No. 234 J.VANGILDER, et al., Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay the Court’s February 3, 2021 Attorneys’ Fees Order. Dkt. No. 234. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. DISCUSSION The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, so the Court only briefly addresses them here. On June 21, 2019, the jury returned a verdict in favor of both Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez in this case and Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros in related case Cisneros v. Vangilder, 16-cv-00735-HSG. See Dkt. No. 209. Final judgment was subsequently entered in favor of each Plaintiff against Defendants Vangilder (in the amount of $1,000) and Vasquez (in the amount of $1,500). See Dkt. No. 223. On February 3, 2021, the Court granted in part Plaintiff Manriquez’s motion for attorneys’ fees, awarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.