Poorsina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALI POORSINA,

Case No. 20-cv-09119-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION XIAOSONG ZHANG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff brings a Motion for Reconsideration in which he asks the Court reconsider its March 31, 2021 Order, dkt. no. 29, granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing his complaint without leave to amend on the basis that there is no federal jurisdiction over his claims. To the extent he seeks leave to file a motion for reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 7-9, the request fails because such a request must be made before judgment has been entered in the case. As the Court has already entered judgment, dkt. no. 30, Plaintiff’s motion is untimely. Even construed as a motion to vacate judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Motion fails. Under Rule 60(b), the Court may relieve a party from a…