Droesch

Droesch v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20213:20-cv-06751California3,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DENISE DROESCH, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06751-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION AND DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

11 Denise Droesch and Shakara Thompson filed this putative class and collective action alleging various employment-related claims under both state and federal law arising out their employment with Wells Fargo Bank. Wells Fargo has moved to compel Ms. Droesch’s claims to arbitration as well as the claims of Opt-in Plaintiffs Taishia Bell, James Galligan, Jonathan Harrison, and Tavares Speer. (Dkt. No. 28.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the May 13, 2021 hearing, GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration, and STAYS Ms. Droesch and the Opt-in Plaintiffs’ Taishia Bell, James Galligan, Jonathan Harrison, and Tavares Speer’s claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.