Bailey

Bailey v. Santa Clara County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20214:21-cv-00279California1,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASPER BAILEY, Case No. 21-cv-00279-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, California, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 17), dismissed the action as barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (Dkt. No. 16), and entered judgment in favor of Defendants (Dkt. No. 18). On April 20, 2021, Plaintiff sent the Court a notice of appeal (Dkt. No. 21), and objections to the dismissal (Dkt. No. 22), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. DISCUSSION I. Background In this action, Plaintiff brought suit against Santa Clara County Superior Court for denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.