Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, LLC v. Hartkopf, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20213:19-cv-03099California5,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY Case No. 19-cv-03099-JSC

COMPANY, LLC,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 94 &

WILLIAM F. HARTKOPF, JR.,

11 Defendant.

12 Defendant and counterclaimant William F. Hartkopf, Jr. and Plaintiff and counter defendant Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, LLC (“Sprint”) entered into a Personal Communication Services Site Agreement (the “Site Agreement” or “Agreement”) under which Mr. Hartkopf leased space on his roof to Sprint for the purpose of installing and operating a personal communication services site (the “PCS Site”). Before the Court are the parties’ cross- motions for summary judgment. Sprint moves for summary judgment on Mr. Hartkopf’s claims, and argues it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor on all of its own claims. (Dkt. No. 94.)2 Mr. Hartkopf moves for summary judgment on Sprint’s claims for breach of contract, the implied …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.