Dew

Dew v. City of Seaside

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20214:19-cv-06009California6,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LORI DEW, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06009-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 49 CITY OF SEASIDE, et al., Defendants.

12 As successors-in-interest of Brandon Virtue, Plaintiffs bring this suit against Seaside Police Chief Abdul Pridgen (“Pridgen”) and former Seaside Police Officer Manuel Fernandez (“Fernandez) (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) and the City of Seaside (together, “Defendants”), alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and various state law claims. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 49 (“Mot.”), 51 (“Opp.”), 52 (“Reply”). The Court held a hearing on the motion for summary judgment on March 4, 2021. Dkt. No. 56. Following the hearing, the Court directed the parties to submit supplemental briefing concerning Defendants’ claim of qualified immunity. See Dkt. Nos. 63 (“PSupp.”) and 64…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.