Snapkeys, LTD v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20215:19-cv-02658California1,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 SNAPKEYS, LTD, Case No. 19-CV-02658-LHK 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED v.

COMPLAINT

14 GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 80 15 Defendant.

On May 16, 2019, Plaintiff Snapkeys, Ltd. (“Snapkeys”) filed the instant case against Defendant Google LLC (“Google”). Before the Court is Snapkeys’ motion for leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 80 (“Mot.”). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Snapkeys’ motion for leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides that leave to amend shall be freely given “when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The Court considers five factors in assessing a motion for leave to amend: “bad faith, undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, futility of amendment, and whether the plaintiff has previously amended the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.