Norris

Norris v. Aon PLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:21-cv-00932California1,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 GISELE NORRIS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00932-CRB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

AON PLC, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiffs Gisele Norris and Henry Yuan sued Defendants Aon PLC, Aon Group, Inc., and Aon Risk Services Companies, Inc. (collectively, Aon) for declaratory and injunctive relief relating to agreements they signed while employed by Aon. Norris and Yuan allege that the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements (RSU Agreements) that they both signed, and the Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement that Yuan signed, “contain a number of void, illegal, and unenforceable provisions, including restrictive covenants that violate well-established law.” See Compl. (dkt. 1) at ¶¶ 15, 19. The Court denied Norris and Yuan’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted Aon’s motion to compel arbitration. See Order Granting Mot. to Compel (dkt. 29) at 12. Norris and Yuan moved for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.