Chinitz
Chinitz v. Intero Real Estate Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RONALD CHINITZ, Case No. 18-cv-05623-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER,
AMEND COMPLAINT, AND
INTERO REAL ESTATE SERVICES, SUBSTITUTE CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE
Defendant. [Re: ECF 178] 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend the scheduling order, complaint, and 13 substitute class representative on behalf of and to protect the certified classes of California 14 residents who allegedly received unlawful telemarketing calls from real estate agents affiliated 15 with Defendant Intero Real Estate Services (“Intero”). See Mot., ECF 178. Intero opposes this 16 motion. See Opp’n, ECF 194. The Court GRANTS this motion and finds good cause to modify the 17 case schedule. The Court also terminates as moot Intero’s pending motion to amend its answer, 18 see ECF 154, as this Court allowing an amended complaint necessarily allows Intero to file an 19 amended answer. 20 “Once the district court…