Pringle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MATHEW MALIK PRINGLE, Case No. 21-cv-00648-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

DINA JOSE, et al., Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mathew M. Pringle’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint on or before July 7, 2021. His action cannot proceed as currently constituted: Pringle has failed to identify a proper defendant and has failed to allege the facts necessary to support several of his claims. Failure to file a proper amended complaint by the deadline, or a failure to comply in every respect with the instructions given in this order, will result in the dismissal of this suit and the entry of judgment in favor of defendants. DISCUSSION I. LEGAL STANDARD A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee…