Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHK
GREGOR LESNIK; STJEPAN PAPES,
13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
14 v. COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF
SETTLEMENT
15 EISENMANN SE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (“Plaintiffs”) bring this motion to compel enforcement of a settlement agreement and for sanctions against settling defendants Eisenmann Corporation, Eisenmann SE, Eisenmann Anlagenbau Verwaltung GmbH, and Eisenmann Anlagenbau GmbH & Co. KG. ECF No. 532 (“Mot.”). Having considered the parties’ briefing, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ motion to compel enforcement of settlement and DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for sanctions. I. BACKGROUND A. Pre-Settlement Background 27 1 Defendant Eisenmann Corporation is a manufacturer of specialized paint shop equipment. See Third Amended Complaint,…