Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20215:16-cv-01120California2,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHK

GREGOR LESNIK; STJEPAN PAPES,

13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

14 v. FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 533, 536, 539 EISENMANN SE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (“Plaintiffs”) have moved to compel enforcement of a settlement agreement against Defendants Eisenmann Corporation, Eisenmann SE, Eisenmann Anlagenbau Verwaltung GmbH, and Eisenmann Anlagenbau GmbH & Co. KG. Before the Court are three motions to file under seal, filed in connection with the briefing on Plaintiffs’ motion to compel enforcement of settlement: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion to file under seal certain portions of the motion to compel enforcement of settlement and supporting declarations and exhibits, ECF No. 533; (2) Defendant Eisenmann Corporation’s (“Defendant”) motion to file under seal certain portions of the opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.