Mario V. v. Alisal Union School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20215:18-cv-00041California3,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARIO V.; GERALDINE JULIE B.;

I.G.V., a minor by and through Case No. 18-cv-00041-BLF Guardian Ad Litem MARIO V.; OSCAR G.; CHRISTINA G.; O.D.G., a minor by and through Guardian Ad Litem ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CHRISTINA G.; Y.P., a minor by and GARCIA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY through Guardian Ad Litem CHRISTINA JUDGMENT; AND DENYING G.; HUGO P.; ALICIA P.; A.P.H., a DEFENDANT ARMENTA’S MOTION minor by and through Guardian Ad FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Litem ALICIA P.; and other Similarly Situated Plaintiffs, [Re: ECF 73, 74] 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 HENRY ARMENTA and DIANA GARCIA, Defendants.

19 This putative class action was filed after an elementary school teacher performed blood sugar testing on students without their parents’ knowledge or consent. Several students and parents brought suit against the teacher, the school principal, the school, and the school district. The school and the school district thereafter were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.