Holland

Holland v. City of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20213:19-cv-02545California1,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL HOLLAND, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02545-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 87 Defendants.

12 On March 23, 2021, the Court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants City of San Francisco and individual police officers. Dkt. No. 84. The Court also entered summary judgment sua sponte for defendant Allied Universal Security Services and its employee, defendant Mark Hankins (the “Allied defendants”) on the one remaining malicious prosecution claim against them. The Allied defendants did not file a summary judgment motion of their own or join the other defendants’ motion. Nevertheless, the Court granted summary judgment with respect to all defendants based on the Court’s finding that probable cause existed to arrest plaintiffs – a finding fundamentally fatal to plaintiffs’ claims against all defendants. Dkt. No. 84 at 102. The issue of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.