Walters
Walters v. Citibank N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 QUINTIN WALTERS, Case No. 21-cv-02190-MMC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
VACATING HEARING; STAYING
CITIBANK, N.A., CASE Defendant.
12 Before the Court is defendant Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") Motion to Compel Arbitration, filed March 29, 2021. Plaintiff Quintin Walters ("Walters") has filed opposition, to which Citibank has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 14, 2021, and rules as follows. In his complaint, Walters, a Citibank customer, alleges he was subjected to racial discrimination in the manner in which Citibank employees provided, or failed to provide, him with services. He asserts two claims, specifically, a claim under § 51.5 of the…