Sinnock

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Sinnock

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20213:19-cv-08262California5,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN Case No. 19-cv-08262-LB

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE

TRUST FUND, et al., ORDER GRANTING THE

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Re: ECF No.

ROBERT CHARLES SINNOCK, individually and doing business as NEIGHBORHOOD GLASS NETWORK, Defendant.

18 INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs — benefits plans and trustees — sued the defendant for failing to make contributions to the plans required by the parties’ collective bargaining agreements, the trust agreements, the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The defendant did not appear in the case (although all parties consented to the court’s jurisdiction). The Clerk of Court entered the defendant’s default, and the plaintiffs moved for default judgment. The court grants the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.