Sinnock
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Sinnock
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN Case No. 19-cv-08262-LB
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE
TRUST FUND, et al., ORDER GRANTING THE
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
Plaintiffs, DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Re: ECF No.
ROBERT CHARLES SINNOCK, individually and doing business as NEIGHBORHOOD GLASS NETWORK, Defendant.
18 INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs — benefits plans and trustees — sued the defendant for failing to make contributions to the plans required by the parties’ collective bargaining agreements, the trust agreements, the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The defendant did not appear in the case (although all parties consented to the court’s jurisdiction). The Clerk of Court entered the defendant’s default, and the plaintiffs moved for default judgment. The court grants the motion…