Pringle

Pringle v. Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:21-cv-00648California2,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, Case No. 21-cv-00406-WHO Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN PART

v. AND SERVICE IN PART; ORDER

DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

K.ALLISON, et al., FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION;

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

Defendants. 11 12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Alejandro Delgadillo Lopez alleges his Eighth Amendment rights were violated by officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) and California Institute for Men (“CIM”), executives at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and a court-appointed federal receiver. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).1 Delgadillo Lopez has stated a cognizable claim for violation of the Eighth Amendment. The Court directs defendants to file in response to the FAC with a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such motion, on or before September 3, 2021. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.